OK, Now I'm Really Pissed
My hatred of John Swofford and the ACC expansion his reign of terror as conference commissioner hath wrought is well-documented. But, in the words of Bachman-Turner Overdrive, "you ain't seen n-n-n-nothin yet."
The ACC and Big 10 released the slate of games for their annual challenge yesterday; 11 games in three nights, highlighted by Greg Oden's Ohio State Buckeyes headed to Chapel Hill for a showdown with a UNC team that will likely start the season ranked #2 in the country. With 11 teams in the improperly-named Big 10 (vs. 12 in the ACC), there are only 11 games to be played, meaning one ACC team gets left in the cold. In 2006, that team will be the Wake Forest Demon Deacons.
What. The. Fuck.
Words can't even described how furious I am right now. (I'm about to defend Skip Prosser for crap's sake, which should shed some light into my surprising fury over a snub from a made-for-ESPN event.) How could they leave Wake out while including three bastardized Big East rejects? (Hell, Big East reject is a term too kind for Virginia Tech and Miami, schools that didn't enter the Big East until after Vanilla Ice's popularity had come and gone.)
How could Clemson, a school whose basketball history George Mason can now mock, get a game when Wake Forest, the home of Dickie Henric, Tim Duncan and Chris Paul, gets left in Winston-Salem to playing freakin' App. State? Aaaaahhhhh, it's so damn infuriating. I'm going to need the cathartic rush that only list-making can give.
ACC Teams invited to the "ACC/Big 10 Challenge"
Boston College - If those Duke lacrosse players get convicted and, subsequently, thrown out of Duke, I'm sure Al Skinner would have no problem giving them a scholarship.
Clemson - When your claim to fame is losing 42 straight games in Chapel Hill, it's time to reevaluate the practicality of having a basketball program.
Florida State - They last time they made the Tournament, Monica Lewinsky's dress was the lead story on the news.
Maryland - Wake might be bad next year, but Maryland's going to be so bad some people actually believed Gary Williams might have even thought about taking the Charlotte Bobcats job.
Miami - Are Miami.
N.C. State - Homeless guys are starting to turn down the job as N.C. State head basketball coach.
Virginia Tech - Seriously, don't even get me started.
Listen, I know Wake Forest basketball doesn't have the history of a Duke or a North Carolina and, thus, don't command the same kind of respect those programs receive and deserve. And the Deacs were terrible in 2005 and figure to be worse in 2006 (although I think they'll win more than three games); but they are still a program with recent history and enough rep to nab an invite to a Challenge they've played in every year since it's founding. That they've played well in the Challenge is even more of a reason to include them. Of the 20 teams to play more than six games in the Challenge, Wake has the second-best record of all of them. (Only Duke has a better record than Wake's 6-1 Challenge mark.)
It's not as if Virginia Tech or Miami is going to be so good in 2006-07 that they need to be on TV. It's not like N.C. State is going to be sneaking around the top ten. Wake got shafted because they're the school with the smallest enrollment, by far, in the ACC and, as a result, has the fewest alumni to watch games and get ESPN advertising dollars. I don't begrudge ESPN's right to pick VT over Wake, that's their prerogative as rights holder to the event. But John Swofford negotiates that deal and should have stepped up and demanded that Wake Forest, a founding member of the ACC, be included in the Challenge that bears it conference's name. If he wants Virginia Tech to be in a challenge, they can rename it the Convicted Felons/Big 10 Challenge and put it on CourtTV.
Shit.
Wednesday, May 03, 2006
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
11 comments:
Wake got left out because they finished last in the conference this past year. Not because of money. Also, you can make fun of Maryland all you want, we have a National Championship. Eat a dick.
That's a convenient excuse the ACC has given, but FSU finished last in 2004 and played in the 2005 Challenge. Clemson finished last in 2003 but played in the 2004 Challenge. The Winston-Salem Journal reported there was no critera set prior to the Challenge and Wake expected to be invited even after finishing last.
And how many straight years has Maryland played in the NIT? Two? Ahh, that's right. Keep living in the past, Ian. You and Byron Mouton.
(Also, there was no need to go there? You know I love the Terps. Maybe you should be the one partaking in the dick-eating.)
And UVA finished with 4 ACC wins from 2004-2005, and despite having a team presumably light years worse than 2006's Wake team at the start of this year, they still played.
And I'll make fun of Maryland all I want, because a: you went to Maryland and b: you think "you" are somehow involved with the "we" that won the national championship.
This is a completely different Ian by the way.
It appears to be.
About the whole "we" thing, I have no problem with people saying "we" when referring to sports teams. (I only do it when conversing when referring to the Redskins to friends of mine who are also Redskins fans, by the way.) Fans invest themselves in a team's season. They pay the player's salaries. In some cases, they care more about the teams than the actual players. They spend money on tickets, memorabilia, clothing, etc. Fans are the team. If Johnny Damon can sell-out to the Yankees, he should. But a fan never sells-out. And that gives him/her a right to say "we".
And when's the last time Georgia won anything of consequence?
I have the same level of hatred for John Swofford as you and I am a Big East Guy (Lets Go....Mountaineers!). Both conferences were great as they were before the expansion of the ACC. It has ruined both of them.
On a side note...
Although I was able to fully support your use of the "F" word when you were referring to the location of Alstott's knee last season on that 2 pt play against the Skins...I am afraid I am going to have to support your mom if she complains about the use of the word in today's post. Just kidding, but the fact you only save that word for so few special occasions, I think we all know how pissed you are about this...with out any defending of Skip P or titleing the post "OK, Now I am so PISSED"
Truth be told, it makes me happy to know it is not just people in the Big East that are pissed about this and have the same level of hatred for John Swafford.
While Wake is certainly a better basketball program than the majority of ACC schools, and I believe the Big Four should always be a part of any basketball "challenge," I think this snub is fair punishment, regardless of Swofford's motivation. Wake didn't just have a bad year last year, they were an inexplicable embarrassment. It's one thing for a talent-starved GT team to manage only four wins. When Justin Gray, Eric Williams, and Trent Strickland can only get three wins in a very weak ACC, well, Wake's lucky they were invited back to the ACC.
Oh, and though Maryland fans are clearly insane, a Nat Champ gives them and Sweaty Gary a 10-year pass to act high and mighty. Though continued rioting and lunacy might reduce that sentence to 5 years.
UGA's won nothing recently (unless you count SEC football Championships), but I'm a UVA undergrad...so unless we're talking lacrosse and soccer (you're probably not), I got nothing.
I'm just more pissed at the "we" thing when people use it to others. Most of time, if I slip up, it's when I'm talking to other UVA fans. It's just with the case of Maryland, how a lot of fans will treat Juan Dixon and Steve Blake like family but disavow McCray, Strawberry and whatnot when they fuck up, saying "oh, that's the basketball team."
Just for the record, Clemson has lost all 52 times it has played in Chapel Hill, not a mere 42. Oh and this just in, The Ultimate Warrior just turned down NC State's coaching job too.
The fact that we handled Wisconsin last year relatively easily and they were one of the better teams in the Big 10/11 should get us in automatically.
I bet the Big 10/11 pushed to get us out. They problem thought that they could justify excluding us on our last place finish and we worried that, given our past success in the challenge, not having Wake would give the Big 10/11 a better chance to actually win the challenge once.
I personally favor the 'Swofford is an ass theory myself' though
if you like boston sports check out my blog
joshqpublic.blogspot.com
Stop hatin' on the Dawgs, or I'll burn your mutha forking house down. http://georgiadogs.collegesports.com/traditions/championships.html
Post a Comment